Comments on: Explain the Emerald Cockroach wasp, Charles Darwin http://brianrisk.com/explain-the-emerald-cockroach-wasp-charles-darwin/ Can it be? Fri, 02 Mar 2012 06:22:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Lance http://brianrisk.com/explain-the-emerald-cockroach-wasp-charles-darwin/comment-page-1/#comment-16181 Lance Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:29:47 +0000 http://brianrisk.com/?p=763#comment-16181 A much tougher problem for evolutionazis is the sand worms of Arrakis. Please explain to me how a worm, 8 times longer than a blue whale, that poops LSD developed in this particular evolutionary niche. Like there was once a worm as big as a blue whale, but larger, slower worms that had to spend more of the day feeding were better at surviving? Surviving what? Scorpion bites? Patrick Stewart? Give me a break. GOD PUT THOSE WORMS THERE TO TEST MAUDIB, PLAIN AND SIMPLE. The Bible says it, and I believe it. A much tougher problem for evolutionazis is the sand worms of Arrakis. Please explain to me how a worm, 8 times longer than a blue whale, that poops LSD developed in this particular evolutionary niche. Like there was once a worm as big as a blue whale, but larger, slower worms that had to spend more of the day feeding were better at surviving? Surviving what? Scorpion bites? Patrick Stewart? Give me a break. GOD PUT THOSE WORMS THERE TO TEST MAUDIB, PLAIN AND SIMPLE. The Bible says it, and I believe it.

]]> By: josh http://brianrisk.com/explain-the-emerald-cockroach-wasp-charles-darwin/comment-page-1/#comment-16166 josh Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:24:33 +0000 http://brianrisk.com/?p=763#comment-16166 First off, consider the alternative to natural selection. Would something with intelligence create something that appears so random? Who thinks of these things? Also, although the steps are elaborate, it's not likely that they were developed all at once. If the larvae can eat the cockroach, my guess is that so can the wasp, so the initial steps might have been fixed because they were good for food and basic survival. Like the first sting was better than no sting (easier to eat a cockroach that isn't moving). The second step would be useful for storing that food for the future (keep it alive so it doen't rot). Then the third step, lay the egg, doesn't seem like that far of a stretch. First off, consider the alternative to natural selection. Would something with intelligence create something that appears so random? Who thinks of these things?

Also, although the steps are elaborate, it’s not likely that they were developed all at once. If the larvae can eat the cockroach, my guess is that so can the wasp, so the initial steps might have been fixed because they were good for food and basic survival. Like the first sting was better than no sting (easier to eat a cockroach that isn’t moving). The second step would be useful for storing that food for the future (keep it alive so it doen’t rot). Then the third step, lay the egg, doesn’t seem like that far of a stretch.

]]>