I’ve seen this enough that I feel like announcing this general rule of thumb:
The last sentence of a section of a Wikipedia article is the most likely to be the least useful.
This arises from contributors not thoroughly reading an article (or not reading it at all) and thinking, “oh, I have something to contribute” so they ungracefully slap it on the very end. For example, In the Wikipedia article for property, at the end of “What can be property?” there is (at the time of this post) this sentence:
Intellectual property and air (airspace, no-fly zone, pollution laws, which can include tradeable emissions rights) can be property in some senses of the word.
No shit? You mean the same intellectual property that was discussed in the first and second paragraphs? And please, do tell me how “pollution laws” are property.